Serial Control > FAQs for the Serial Control Module > FAQs: Checking in Issues of a Serial

FAQs: Checking in Issues of a Serial

How do I receive a special issue, such as a supplement or index?

How do I receive a special issue, such as a fill-in issue?

How do I receive fewer copies than were expected?

How do I determine how the copies of a partially received issue will be distributed?

The Auto Distribute Partially Received Issues behavior property in the Check In Issues of a Serial wizard must be cleared in order to manually distribute copies.

How do I receive an issue out of order?

How do I combine two issues into a single issue that includes more than one issue number?

How do I receive duplicate or replacement issues?

For example, if you are receiving a duplicate issue with the chronology February 22, 2004, type the following: FEB 22, 2004 DUP.

Effect on Copies Added to the Catalog at Check In

In the control record, if it is indicated that copies should be added to the catalog at check in, and the control record indicates that the form of the name to display includes chronology, the DUP (or REP) designation will be included in the call number record created by SirsiDynix Symphony.

Effect on MARC Holdings at Check In

A duplicate or replacement issue received using the steps outlined previously will not update MARC holdings. Note If you add the DUP or REP designation to enumeration instead of the recommended chronology, and the control record indicates that check in should update MARC holdings, receiving the issue will add an 866 to the MARC holdings record.

Effect on Latest Issues at Check In

If the control record indicates that receiving should update the latest issues statement in the bibliographic record, duplicate or replacement issues will be reflected in the latest issues statement. Further, if the control record indicates that the form of the name to add to the catalog includes chronology, the DUP (or REP) designation will be included in the latest issues statement.

A second copy that was received by editing the receipt record has been claimed. What could be wrong?

Receiving additional issues by editing the receipt record will not update the distribution record, and therefore, could cause the additional issues to be claimed. The recommended method for receiving an additional issue at a later time is to use the Check in Issues of a Serial wizard. This wizard by default displays the next expected issue.

To receive additional issues, do the following.

By checking in the issue in this manner, all associated records are updated appropriately.

How do I check in a routed issue?

How do I barcode copies being added to the catalog?

The Auto Create Copies for Received Issues behavior property in the Check In Issues of a Serial wizard must be cleared in order to manually create barcodes. Also, the serial control record must indicate the number of copies to add to the catalog for each distribution. The Copies to Add field is located on the Distribution tab of a serial control.

If you are scanning barcodes, the process cannot complete until the last copy in the list is barcoded. When the last barcode is scanned the wizard goes on to the next step as if you had clicked OK.

How do I “unreceive” issues that were accidentally received?

How do I delete received issues?

Issue dates (chronologies) are not collapsing and appear as ranges in MARC holdings. What could be wrong?

The chronology type for this serial control record is probably Custom; and even though the issues indicate a non-standard name, the chronology in the control record must be standard in order for the issue dates to appear as ranges in MARC holdings.

For example, the serial control record for an irregular monthly serial indicates the following chronology.

2001:DEC

As issues are checked in, they will appear as 2002:JAN, 2002:FEB, and so on. These issues will not collapse and appear as a date range. This serial control record should indicate the following standard chronology, even though the date on the issue appears as 2001:DEC.

DEC 2001

Standard names are defined in the Chronology policy, and follow standard AACR2 rules.

When I receive an issue of a periodical, I want to create a copy in the catalog so it can be checked out, but I don’t want all of those copies to appear in the catalog. Is there a way to automatically shadow these copies as they are created?

To automatically shadow a copy when it is created as part of the receiving process, do the following.

How do I generate more predictions during serials check in?

If a warning message displays indicating that there are no more expected issues, select Generate Prediction or Review. If you select the Generate Predictions button, you may generate new predictions based on existing pattern information.

If you select the Review button, you may review the serial control pattern information in the control record.

Related topics 

 


© 2006, 2014 SirsiDynix